Unit Reflection: 9HUMtt Te Taiao semester 2

We are learning to:

  • Create blogposts on Edublogs to reflect on our professional practice;
  • Use the Edublogs commenting features to give feedback to colleagues.

I am reflecting on the introductory module to my semester 2 course, Te Taiao.

1. How well did the learners meet the intended learning outcomes for curriculum and for deep learning?

Both Matua Kere and I have a 9HUMtt course in different lines. We have deliberately set up the course so that it covers aspects not only of the English and Social Sciences curriculum, but, also Te Reo Māori and Science learning areas. I have a large class, with 27 students of mixed ability. For the first introductory module, we have been looking at the concept of Kaitiakitanga; who the Kaitiaki? Why is it important to have Kaitiaki? What does this mean in terms of Te Taiao? I cannot yet make comment on progress against curriculum levels as we are only 4 weeks into the course.

2. How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?

I have worked to ensure that the Manaiakalani pedagogical approach is embedded in what we do in the classroom. It does help that I have a student teacher working with this class at the moment. At the start of the year, and as a way of introduction, stude nts had to complete THIS beginning of the year journal activity, as well as a blog post introducing themselves to myself. Being a Humanities course, literacy skills are built into our programme, e.g., personal reading and a reading log, using writers tool box (daily challenge or learning journey). Wew have recently started reading Bary Crump’s Wild Pork and Watercress, which inspired Taika Waititi’s Hunt for the Wilderpeople. My student teacher and I have found that breaking each chapter down, and completing a read aloud, has worked a treat, with brief activities to build on their literacy skills, namely reading comprehension. We have also started making use of visiting the maara, so that students can see how they can put the concept of Kaitiakitanga into practice. 

3. What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?

Having a viariety of activities for students to complete rather than mundane “busy” tasks. Activities are varied and allow students to work both in smaller groups and cooperative learning group opportunities. Also having a designated writing book (1B8) for students to compelte their mahi in – not assuming that they will always be able to use their devices to complete their mahi has worked well. What it does highlight for me is the assumed knowledge that students work best on devices. In fact, my student teacher and I have quickly discovered that requiring students to write down their answers in their 1B8 workbooks has worked much better than getting students to necessarily write responses electroncially.

 

Read more

Course Reflection: 10 Humanities – World Government and Human Rights – Semester 1, 2025

We are learning to:

  • Create blogposts on Edublogs to reflect on our professional practice;
  • Use the Edublogs commenting features to give feedback to colleagues.

I am reflecting on my Semester 1 Y10 Humanities course, World Government and Human Rights. This was a compulsory course for Year 10 students in 2025, and included key Aotearoa/NZ Histories and Social Studies content about government systems and human rights. This was a new course and it was the first time I had taught some of the Social Studies content.

  1. How well did the learners meet the intended learning outcomes for curriculum and for deep learning?

Consider the numbers of learners achieving at each level of the curriculum and DL rubrics. Were there significant shifts demonstrated in this process? Did results differ from previous years? What factors may have influenced this?

In terms of curriculum achievement, the English aspect course was an abject failure, as the main summative assessment for the extended text study never even happened. Usually, after studying the Holocaust memoir Night, my class would write a response to text essay, learning the essay-writing skills they need for NCEA English. Due to numerous interruptions, however, the class only just managed to finish reading the book by the last week of the semester, and there was no time to write an essay.

The Social Sciences aspects were assessed formatively, mostly through student learning reflections on their blogs. I believe all students engaged with these aspects of the course and showed their learning.

For the Deep Learning outcomes, there were some blog reflections, but no before/after data.

 

  1. How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?

Consider the four elements of learning design: pedagogical practices, learning partnerships, learning environments, and leveraging digital; and also, your use of literacy and numeracy strategies.

Literacy strategies were fully incorporated throughout the unit, with small group reading instruction, multi-choice response to text quizzes, and learning reflections. Students were exposed to a range of text types related to the Holocaust and Human Rights. Numeracy strategies were not incorporated.

Pedagogy – as above, plus application of critical literacy and T-shaped literacy strategies.

Learning partnerships – not much outside the class teacher and peers.

Learning environments – classroom and library only.

Leveraging Digital – nearly all learning was online and took advantage of digital tools.

 

  1. What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?

What worked well? What might you improve? How might you do things differently next time?

The learning design was adequate, but not all of it was implemented, due to time constraints and interruptions to the learning programme.

Extended text study – was started too late; another time I would put that much earlier – start with the historical background to the Holocause right at the beginning of the year, so that we would finish the extended text in plenty of time to allow 2-3 weeks for the essay.

The teaching of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was rushed at the end of the semester. Another time I would do that part before teaching the Holocaust and the memoir.

Essentially, I don’t think that the planning or the teaching and learning activities were lacking or inappropriate, but the timing did not work. The start of the unit was impacted by the whole-school orientation programme, with the introduction of SchoolJoy, and the switch of Year 12s and 13s from the Blogger platform to Edublogs, which is less user-friendly. We then had nearly 2 weeks impacted by start of year literacy testing, which was more drawn out than usual, due to us being involved in piloting the PAT writing test. This involved 2 extra tests on top of what we normally do. It seemed that we had barely got into the course material after that when we had to pause to prepare students for the NCEA Literacy CAAs, and time for them to sit these and Numeracy.

While all the activities were important, the net result was that we lost a good half a term or one quarter of the half-year semester, making it impossible to complete all the planned teaching and learning sequence.

Next time, the orientation programme will not be as long, since it will be a refresher, but we will still have to manage getting students signed up for their NZQA accounts and preparing for the CAA exams.

Read more

1st Semester Unit Reflection

We are learning to:

  • Create blogposts on Edublogs to reflect on our professional practice;
  • Use the Edublogs commenting features to give feedback to colleagues.

I am reflecting on my Semester One Year 10 Japanese course. In this course we take the Basic Self-Introduction from Year 9 Japanese and build on it, introducing Sports, School Subjects and subject Teachers, and how we feel about these subjects using Adjectives.

1. How well did the learners meet the intended learning outcomes for curriculum and for deep learning?

Students mastered Hiragana Script recognition including sound changes. They also learned Subject names and adjectives to describe the subjects and teachers. By the end of Semester One, they were able to work in groups to “Speed Write” sentences from English into Japanese.

2. How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?

I taught some things such as the Hiragana sound changes deliberately and more thoroughly in the past as I now have 4 lessons per week as opposed to 5 per fortnight in the past. This enabled me to go into every topic in much more depth. This has resulted in me and my students feeling more able to connect with and apply new learning.

3. What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?

Much more enjoyable than in the past. More opportunities for team work and pair practice. Also way more independent Active Learning as work was set on the Year  10 Japanese Class site for students to complete at their own pace.

Read more

Unit/Course Reflection: 9/10 Drama – Manaakitanga & Empathy

We are learning to:

  • Create blogposts on Edublogs to reflect on our professional practice;
  • Use the Edublogs commenting features to give feedback to colleagues.

I am reflecting on 9/10 Drama – Empathy & Manaakitanga topic from Term 1, continued focus in Term 2. 

  1. How well did the learners meet the intended learning outcomes for curriculum and for deep learning?

The students improved in their self-assessment grades and the teacher observation based results for both manaakitanga and empathy from term 1 to Term 2. They were on track for their curriculum level achievement. Overall the students initially achieved quite low in empathy in particular (7/9 were at developing in Term 1, by end of term 2 only 5/9 were at developing. ). This was accurate for the empathy shown within class. Students tended to be empathetic to friends, but not to other students. This was what we worked on. 

I am unsure why this cohort struggled with expressing empathy so much, it could be covid related, it could be neurodiversity related, it could just be the dynamics in the class.

  1. How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?

Consider the four elements of learning design: pedagogical practices, learning partnerships, learning environments, and leveraging digital; and also, your use of literacy and numeracy strategies.

Overall, the final project was that they had to create a short play which showed a situation in which a character had to make a choice. They had to show both options – the kind/empathetic choice and outcome, and the unkind/unempathetic choice and the outcome. This decision tree type of project was good at starting discussions and getting them to think about choices and outcomes. They then had to rehearse and present to the class.
Pedagogical practices – project based, experiential, role play.

Learning partnerships – within class only.
Learning environments – only classroom and hall.
Leveraging digital – only used for sound.
Literacy – students drew out their plans & visually mapped their plot. They used their verbal literacy skills to discuss, refine and memorise.
Numeracy – mapping a process/flow chart (minimal) and considering decision trees (minimal)

  1. What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?

What worked well? What might you improve? How might you do things differently next time?

Next time we may write the situations together or I may provide them and then randomly distribute. Some students chose situations that didn’t have as much depth to explore. Next time I will go deeper in terms of requiring more deep thinking about decisions and using conventions like spoken thought.

My planning/documentation is lacking.

Read more

Unit/Course Reflection: 9/10 Drama – Manaakitanga & Empathy

We are learning to:

  • Create blogposts on Edublogs to reflect on our professional practice;
  • Use the Edublogs commenting features to give feedback to colleagues.

I am reflecting on 9/10 Drama – Empathy & Manaakitanga topic from Term 1, continued focus in Term 2. 

  1. How well did the learners meet the intended learning outcomes for curriculum and for deep learning?

The students improved in their self-assessment grades and the teacher observation based results for both manaakitanga and empathy from term 1 to Term 2. They were on track for their curriculum level achievement. Overall the students initially achieved quite low in empathy in particular (7/9 were at developing in Term 1, by end of term 2 only 5/9 were at developing. ). This was accurate for the empathy shown within class. Students tended to be empathetic to friends, but not to other students. This was what we worked on. 

I am unsure why this cohort struggled with expressing empathy so much, it could be covid related, it could be neurodiversity related, it could just be the dynamics in the class.

  1. How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?

Consider the four elements of learning design: pedagogical practices, learning partnerships, learning environments, and leveraging digital; and also, your use of literacy and numeracy strategies.

Overall, the final project was that they had to create a short play which showed a situation in which a character had to make a choice. They had to show both options – the kind/empathetic choice and outcome, and the unkind/unempathetic choice and the outcome. This decision tree type of project was good at starting discussions and getting them to think about choices and outcomes. They then had to rehearse and present to the class.
Pedagogical practices – project based, experiential, role play.

Learning partnerships – within class only.
Learning environments – only classroom and hall.
Leveraging digital – only used for sound.
Literacy – students drew out their plans & visually mapped their plot. They used their verbal literacy skills to discuss, refine and memorise.
Numeracy – mapping a process/flow chart (minimal) and considering decision trees (minimal)

  1. What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?

What worked well? What might you improve? How might you do things differently next time?

Next time we may write the situations together or I may provide them and then randomly distribute. Some students chose situations that didn’t have as much depth to explore. Next time I will go deeper in terms of requiring more deep thinking about decisions and using conventions like spoken thought.

My planning/documentation is lacking.

Read more

PHY3 – Mechanical Systems Reflection

I am reflecting on the teaching and learning that took place with the level 3 physics class as we worked through the material for the externally assessed standard – Mechanical Systems.

  1. How well did the learners meet the intended learning outcomes for curriculum and for deep learning?

Based on formative assessments, class discussions, on the spot questioning via open questions, critiquing other students answers etc, the class have shown good progress and are expected to perform well in the derived grade exams this week. The main (and deliberate) DL C we are focusing on is Critical Thinking – Meaning knowledge construction. Students are improving in their ability to express their ideas and are now starting to explain their reasoning by default instead of being prompted.

 

  1. How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?

The learning outcomes have been met through a well designed and paced course with good resources and variation in content delivery to suit different learning styles.

 

  1. What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?

The current student workbook we have is an excellent resource, especially for when students are missing lessons. The pacing was pretty good, but in hindsight the class might have benefitted from spending slightly more time on certain parts of the topic (resolving forces in horizontal circular motion, use of the reference circle to model SHM and, finally, the relationship between rotational inertia and both angular momentum and rotational kinetic energy.

Read more

Course Reflection – Y10 Health Terms 1 & 2 – 2025

We are learning to:

  • Create blogposts on Edublogs to reflect on our professional practice;
  • Use the Edublogs commenting features to give feedback to colleagues.

I am reflecting on my Y10 Health programme which ran over Terms 1 and 2 this year. It was the first time we had offered this as a course in this structure so I feel it’s important to get some ideas down on how things went and what we need to look at to improve on things if it is to continue in this structure in 2026.

The course comprised of the following units:

  • Ko wai au
  • Vaping and Energy Drinks
  • Bullying Prevention
  • Sexuality Education

How well did learners meet the intended learning outcomes?
Majority achieving between the Achieved/Merit criteria on the unit assessments. Some outstanding and consistently in the Excellence bracket. This could largely be down to student comfort with difficult/vulnerable topics. There were instances as well where students obvious interest in/lack of interest dictated their level of engagement as well (students who have had experience being bullied were more engaged in the bullying inquiry project then those who are more likely to have been bullies/not experienced significant bullying in the past).

How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?
Learning design was by far more engaging in the Bullying unit compared to Ko wai au, Vaping/Energy Drinks and Sexuality education as this was more student led and also meaningful to students and the direction they chose to take this project.
Part of this was because of the Ko wai au, Vaping/Energy Drink and Sexuality topics we were covering mahi that comes from already developed resources and I didn’t feel comfortable deviating too far from the source material, whereas in the Bullying unit we finished the established content early and as a culminating activity I developed a inquiry task which required students to ‘Do something about Bullying’. This provided them with a tangible and meaningful task to work towards that they could then be held accountable for and could be completed in a way that suited them, their strengths and interests.

What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?
As mentioned above, the Bullying unit was really supported by the inquiry aspect of it. I think finding a way to do the same with the other course topics would greatly enhance student engagement and overall quality of the mahi that was produced in this space.
As the sexuality unit is the majority of a terms work, this would definitely be the best place to incorporate something big picture.

 

Read more

Course Reflection – Y10 Health Terms 1 & 2 – 2025

We are learning to:

  • Create blogposts on Edublogs to reflect on our professional practice;
  • Use the Edublogs commenting features to give feedback to colleagues.

I am reflecting on my Y10 Health programme which ran over Terms 1 and 2 this year. It was the first time we had offered this as a course in this structure so I feel it’s important to get some ideas down on how things went and what we need to look at to improve on things if it is to continue in this structure in 2026.

The course comprised of the following units:

  • Ko wai au
  • Vaping and Energy Drinks
  • Bullying Prevention
  • Sexuality Education

How well did learners meet the intended learning outcomes?
Majority achieving between the Achieved/Merit criteria on the unit assessments. Some outstanding and consistently in the Excellence bracket. This could largely be down to student comfort with difficult/vulnerable topics. There were instances as well where students obvious interest in/lack of interest dictated their level of engagement as well (students who have had experience being bullied were more engaged in the bullying inquiry project then those who are more likely to have been bullies/not experienced significant bullying in the past).

How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?
Learning design was by far more engaging in the Bullying unit compared to Ko wai au, Vaping/Energy Drinks and Sexuality education as this was more student led and also meaningful to students and the direction they chose to take this project.
Part of this was because of the Ko wai au, Vaping/Energy Drink and Sexuality topics we were covering mahi that comes from already developed resources and I didn’t feel comfortable deviating too far from the source material, whereas in the Bullying unit we finished the established content early and as a culminating activity I developed a inquiry task which required students to ‘Do something about Bullying’. This provided them with a tangible and meaningful task to work towards that they could then be held accountable for and could be completed in a way that suited them, their strengths and interests.

What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?
As mentioned above, the Bullying unit was really supported by the inquiry aspect of it. I think finding a way to do the same with the other course topics would greatly enhance student engagement and overall quality of the mahi that was produced in this space.
As the sexuality unit is the majority of a terms work, this would definitely be the best place to incorporate something big picture.

 

Read more

Unit/Course Reflection: Algebra and Graphing

Create blogposts on Edublogs to reflect on our professional practice – 

I am reflecting on Y 10 Algebra and graphs 

1. How well did the learners meet the intended learning outcomes for curriculum and for deep learning?

mixed – some who entered the topic with a higher level of knowledge where able to learn extend their understanding but some needed to step back and learn the previous lead in info

2. How well did the learning design meet the intended learning outcomes?

mid – students attention spans where limited so less was covered then intended, more variety of activities where needed to encourage engagement.

3. What parts of the learning design worked well, what can be improved?

group work, students teacher others, students own book to work at their own pace, – more variety of activities more encaging activities, more room for student choice and more variety of assessment options could have improved this unit. 

Read more

PD Manaiakalani Webinar – 28 July 2025

I am connecting with other teachers for an online webinar to discuss learners with diverse needs. 

1. Describe what you have done in the PD session today.

Discussed diverse learners. I shared things which had been successful in my class, such as guiding students towards acting parts which worked for them.

2. What is a positive for you?
Hearing from others about their successes. Jude talked about tukana/teina strategy successes.

3. What can you take with you from today to use with one of your classes?

There was little that was specifically relevant to my subject from other schools. However, Jude and Marcia reminded me about the benefits of tukana/teina and has encouraged me to build this in more.

Read more

Manaiakalani Reading Practice Intensive Course – Day 8: Create!

Whakawhanaungatanga & Homework Feedback

Homework: With my new class I am still setting up the reading groups and beginning again to teach the Ground Rules for Talk and the critical analyst roles. So I have not been observed yet for the group critical discussion based on a provocation. I have that partially planned, and should do it in the next couple of weeks.

My class did complete a task that required them to find a news article or opinion piece about Artificial Intelligence (AI), and they created a shared slideshow where each student summarised and linked their article, and said whether it presented a negative or positive view of AI:

I felt that this task went really well, and students had to present it orally to practise their speaking skills also.

Like me, many of the teachers in my breakout group have not done the homework from Day 7 and are planning on catching it up in the coming weeks – it is definitely a busy time. We have senior Derived Grade exams for NCEA starting next week, so have been busy preparing for that. Other schools had trips and school-wide activities happening as well.

 

Dorothy – Manaiakalani Kaupapa and Shared Pedagogy – ‘Create’ as a response to Reading (& Writing): Engaging and Empowering Learning

Opportunities to respond to text by creativity deepens learning and engagement and enables students to think in new ways. We need to plan opportunities in our programmes for the creativity, and that is our responsibility as teachers. When the creative opportunities are provided, the students will take agency and fly with them.

Being creative has been a defining characteristic of humans since the beginning of time. 

A well-accepted definition of creativity is the generation of a new product that’s both novel and appropriate in a particular scenario. (A product could be an idea, an artwork, an invention, or an assignment in your classroom.). BUT there isn’t just one way for a person to “be creative,” or one set of characteristics that will differentiate “the” creative person. Instead, many experts think of creativity as a set of skills and attitudes that anyone is capable of: bringing one’s personality (or flair) to an activity, redefining old problems in new ways, tolerating ambiguity, finding new problems to solve, taking sensible risks, and following an inner passion. Vygotsky wrote about “everyday creativity” and it was his view that creativity is fundamental to the development of all individuals.

With digital tools, we can create like never before: Not only can we use ever-increasing ways to harness digital innovation in creative ways, but we can digitise and share what we create with our hands in the ‘real world’. Media which include sight, sound, and motion – SiSoMo – coined by Saatchi and Saatchi pioneer, Kevin Roberts, engage the viewer and remain in the memory. An example of this is the Toyota ‘Bugger!’ ads, which we all remember.

 

Technology offers a mess-free, engaging way to support creativity with tools such as AI content generators, digital video editing, podcasting, 3D printing, and Google Earth, empowering students to create and innovate with minimal physical setup. The use of AI tools (including chat GPT and others) should be paired with critical thinking to ensure accuracy and thoughtful engagement. It is important to create student experiences with digital tools to develop critical digital literacy and resistance to misinformation and deep fakes.

A detailed spreadsheet tracking AI app privacy, ethics, and suitability for classroom use was shared to support safe and responsible AI integration.

Dorothy introduced resources like Adobe Express, Gemini, and Wondercraft.ai to facilitate creative projects such as podcasting in class, and suggested a range of AI tools which can be used for students to create in response to text, such as generating an illustration of a character, or the student creating a podcast.

I liked the look of GoogleLitTrips: virtual Literary field Trips where students become virtual traveling companions traveling right alongside characters in stories commonly taught in schools. As students move through the story, Google Lit Trips supplement the learning experience as story locations are mapped on Google Earth, “just in time” resources “3-Dimensionalize” geographical, historical, and cultural influences the characters’ experience, with relevant media, thought-provoking discussion starters, and links to supplementary information about “real world” references in that portion of the story.

 

Janet – Explore: ‘Creating’ in Reading

Janet led a creative task involving recording voice readings, adding illustrated backgrounds, and comparing with published illustrations to deepen multimodal literacy and engagement. The learning activity integrated use of voice recording tools, Canva AI illustrations, and classroom discussions to connect reading, writing, and creativity.

We were challenged with creating an AI generated illustration of a text. This is my illustration of the poem Te Marama, by Kelly Joseph:

I also had to create a short podcast of me reading the text, and link that on the slideshow.

We were then asked to compare our design with the published original and reflect on it:

I actually prefer my generated image. Firstly, I like the the emphasis on the moonlight (“silvery light”). The original clearly shows a young girl inside a room (“floods my room”) but my new image takes her outside. I like the way the hair is styled with Maori design elements. I also like the ambiguity that the young woman could be the persona of the poem (“Tonight I can’t sleep”) or she could be te marama, the moon, herself.

 

Kiri – Chalk ‘n Talk: Why is Creativity so Important?

Kiri began her session by asking us to reflect using Padlet on the enablers and constraints to creativity in our classrooms.

Kiri presented on the critical integration of arts, STEM, and enterprise with creativity to prepare students for future challenges, emphasizing social intelligence, cultural communication, and environmental awareness. The fusion of arts, technology, and sciences reflects contemporary creative industries trends, with increasing economic and cultural significance.

The importance of empowering students to produce creative work to become critical consumers of media, particularly in digital spaces, was highlighted. She stressed that students need to be creators of text, not just consumers of text.

The good news is that teenagers in New Zealand are among the most creative thinkers in the world, according to the latest edition of OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) Volume 3 results released in June 2024. PISA measures the creative thinking skills of 15-year-old students across the world. Students sat an innovative test that assessed their capacity to generate diverse and original ideas, as well as to evaluate and improve upon others’ ideas in creative tasks. These ranged from written and visual expression to scientific and social problem solving.

New Zealand ranked fifth in the world out of 81 countries, with an average score of 36 points per student, which is higher than the OECD average of 33 points.

Link – https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/new-pisa-results-on-creative-thinking_b3a46696-en

A multimodal communication model was discussed to support lesson design incorporating modes such as visual, auditory, linguistic, musical, and spatial to address diverse learner strengths.

The session ended with a collaborative sharing of effective creative classroom practices, ranging from digital tools to hands-on activities, demonstrating diverse successful approaches.

 

Naomi – Using Create to Show Learning (Part I)

Naomi introduced the concept of using creative tools to deepen learning across subject areas, emphasizing the need for base texts for activities. Tools like Google Drawings, Slides, Adobe Creative Cloud Express, and Canva were highlighted as options for both teachers and students.

The idea of designing ‘tight’ versus ‘loose’ creative tasks was introduced to manage time and creativity, with tighter designs acting as stencils or graphic organizers helping scaffold student creativity. Naomi challenged us to think about short, sharp, ‘Create’ opportunities in our classrooms.

Several examples of tight design stencils linked to environmental themes and fiction texts were presented, illustrating how to scaffold creative tasks effectively. We were asked to contribute our stencil designs to a shared register for collaborative use across cohorts.

I got sidetracked into creating the Kahoot activity below, and haven’t yet created a stencil design. We need to create one of those activities for our homework from today’s meet.

Kiri – Using Create to Show Learning (Part II)

Kiri emphasized integrating choice and collaboration into creative tasks: students could choose tools, task foci (like character or setting), or the final product format.

Tools such as Storyboard That, Book Creator, and Pixton were recommended for storytelling and collaboration. StoryboardThat can also be used to show stages and process in non-fiction text. Kiri encouraged involving students in creating quizzes to deepen learning.

Collaboration skills were stressed as essential soft skills; suggestions included group projects with individual components and activities using green screen technology to simulate real-world actions like a beach cleanup.

Data from observations highlighted the need to increase opportunities for student choice and collaboration in classroom creativity.

I created this activity for my Y10 Humanities film study:

 

 

Fiona Grant – Create a One-Shot Film

Fiona introduced the ‘One-Shot Film’ concept as a quick, simple video creation method that students can use to share learning confidently with minimal editing. The film could be anything from a talk-to-camera presentation to role-plays, demonstrations, or book trailers.

Tips included standing while filming, ensuring good lighting, stable device setup, and using available digital tools (Google Slides recording, Google Meet backgrounds, QuickTime).

Fiona emphasized building student confidence with filming and sharing, co-constructing success criteria, self and peer review, and appropriate use of vocabulary. She provided several links and guides for video creation tools, including the option of vertical video formats for social media styles. The aim is to harness creativity with speedy sharing beyond the classroom.

 

Janet – Activity – Create our own One-Shot Film of us presenting a Book Trailer

Janet guided us through creating a one-minute book trailer as a practical application of the One Shot Film concept. Examples she showed from previous participants highlighted the use of props, eye contact, and engaging dialogue to recommend books effectively. Here is a link to the Google Drive folder of Book Trailers created by RPI participants.

Here is my One-Shot Book Trailer: Turncoat by Tihema Baker:

Naomi – Create in Planned Units, Modules or Concepts

Naomi presented a model of longer ‘Create’ units using a website format to curate and organize content related to extended texts or topics (e.g., novel studies, language weeks, science units) with modular chapters that can be updated independently.

Websites can include varied learning activities such as reading chapters, comprehension questions, AI-generated additional information, videos, fact files, vocabulary exercises, multiple-choice questions, and recording oneself reading. The approach allows for learner self-pacing and supports catch-up for students who miss certain chapters, providing flexibility.

Emphasis on collaboration was shown in activities such as character interviews scripted with a buddy, and learners are encouraged to use voice-to-text tools to create texts, instead of writing on novel pages directly. The website model also supports embedding collaborative tools like digital word walls and shared slide presentations, fostering community learning.

Participants shared ideas for using websites for poetry anthologies, science experiments, cultural events (e.g., Treaty, ANZAC, Olympics), and extended reading projects. Digital word walls and tools like Canva were mentioned as great ways to share ideas and create collaborative digital content embedded in the website.

The importance of including multimodal content and making the sites easy to navigate was emphasized. Someone suggested using a website for students to showcase their poetry. Recommendations for reading and sharing external news articles on class websites were shared to encourage broad reading habits outside class.

 

Kiri – Pulling it All Together

Kiri recapped the day’s themes focusing on the importance of giving learners choice, collaboration, and opportunities to create across subjects, highlighting the value of self-efficacy and agency.

Emphasis was placed on the teacher’s role as the “Gatekeeper for creativity,” responsible for scheduling and embedding creative opportunities in lessons. To extend learning impact and motivation, we were encourage to enable students to share creations with authentic audiences, including parents and the wider public.

Reference was made to various teaching models and resources to design creative learning experiences, including tighter constraints (templates, outlines) and looser free-form creations. We were encouraged to reflect on ways to incorporate these approaches in our own classrooms in the coming weeks.

 

Reflection

I think my main takeaways from today are:

  • The reminder that it is up to us as teachers to make the space for creativity in our programmes. We should make it a key part of the learning, not an extra which can happen at the end after all the ‘real learning’ is done!
  • That creating is engaging and key to learning, and I have appreciated this because the things I have most enjoyed today were creating the poetry slide, the podcast recording, designing the ‘Create a Kahoot’ activity, and making the one-shot video.
  • That ‘create’ opportunities can be small and quick, not always tasks that will take a whole lesson (or several lessons), so I should be looking for places to incorporate these throughout the learning programme.
  • That I should continue to include ‘create’ opportunities for my seniors as well as my junior classes, because being creative shouldn’t be something we stop doing when we get to Year 11!

 

Homework

We need to create a ‘tight’ i.e. short and structured ‘Create’ opportunity using a stencil design, as demonstrated by Naomi, and implement that for homework. It needs to incorporate student choice and opportunity to work collaboratively.  I think that will be a fun activity both for me to create and for the students to carry out.

We were also asked to repeat the Reader Profile Survey. In fact, I have already done this a couple of weeks ago, because I have a completely new class and was ‘starting over’ with them. I haven’t yet had time to compare the results with the previous class, and will do that over the next few weeks.

Read more

Science Meeting with Manaiakalani

  • Strengthening students’ writing in science through collaborative and peer learning 
  • Q and A re: NCEA assessment

A very interesting session about Blogging for Science Students.

Paula Calver 

Curriculum Advisor

Ministry of Education advised us all that there would be no announcements for NCEA or ERO

Kery demonstrated use of class blogging site for Science and L2 Biology The use of a class site allowed students to safely share answers and read peers comments for further learning.

Forward thinking we must get onto our class sites so that students can use this tool to benefit their learning.

Read more

Blogging about PD 28 July 2025

I am connecting with other teachers for an online webinar to discuss…

 

. Describe what you have done in the PD session today.

  1. What is a positive for you?
  2. What can you take with you from today to use with one of your classes?

 

Was an excellent session with meryn penno today talking about the CAAs.

Key points to emerge were that students need to read the question at least twice before answering as many of the questios are written to trick kids, also that they need to be able to answer multiple choice questions and be taught how to do it.

We all agreed that many of the questions are very ambiguous in what they are asking and that it seems designed to trick kids and not actuallty test there abilities or knoiwledge of the tasks.

 

Read more

PD Manaiakalani Webinar 28 July 2025

Learning Goal: connecting with other teachers for an online webinar to discuss making learning engaging and implementing effective practice.

This was a relaxed discussion session in a small online group with colleagues from around the country. Everyone shared some aspect of their practice which was engaging their students.

I was interested in hearing about ‘Active Learning’ which seemed to be similar to our Deep Learning and involved students having choice and being creative in applying their learning.

I was also reminded that no matter what subject or year level we are teaching, we all have a lot in common and face common issues.

One brilliant idea shared was having posters that whanau can stick on their fridge with a QR code that takes them to the student’s learning blog – this is a visual reminder to whanau to look at the blog and add comments. Students were also encouraged to end their blogposts with a question, to give their whanau something to comment on/react to. I am definitely going to follow up on that idea, maybe making a laminated card that can go on the fridge and including some tips for commenting.

This was the slideshow shared for the session:

Read more

Writer’s Toolbox Challenge

This week in class we are using writer’s toolbox.  Writers tool box is where you write something about a picture. The pictures are  a tiger mixed with an owl, and a surprised squirrel. But we have to use some letters and words, so it can’t be easy.

By Amaia W.

Read more

Alaskan Wood Frogs

Freeze if you dare! Wait are you an Alaskan Wood Frog?  Phew you’re not because if you were you would be frozen right now. Yeah you heard it, you would be frozen right now!  But you will not die!  How crazy is that!  The Alaskan Wood frog is so amazing.  It lives in Alaska where it is really cold …

By Eva

…Alaskan Wood Frogs can be frozen in ice for 8 months.  In Spring they defrost and hop to the nearest pond.  While they are frozen they don’t breathe, their heart stops beating and they don’t blink.  In their body they have something like antifreeze.  Alaskan Wood Frog sound amazing!

By Ollie

 

Read more

SchoolJoy PD Session

The Humanities Faculty combined with the Year 7 & 8 department today to work with Katrina Laurie from Core Education on our SchoolJoy teacher licences. I was pleasantly surprised that I could complete all of the level 1 activities so I officially have my ‘Learner’s Licence’!

Level 1 covers the following activities:

The only task I was unable to complete was using the Teacher Assistant function, as I asked it to sync/update my class data and it was taking a while to do that, so the TA function was not available. I will come back and complete that task later.

This is the link to my SchoolJoy Teacher’s Licence record, where I am recording my progress.

I found today’s session encouraging, as I thought I had not made any progress on the licence activities, but now realise that I have completed the first stage.

Read more

Learning about Moa and De-extinction

This week I learnt that there are 9 different Moas. Moa are flightless birds and easy to hunt because they can’t run fast. Haast Eagle and humans hunted Moas. The South Island Moa is the biggest Moa out of them all and the Bush Moa is the smallest type. Peter Jackson and  some smart scientists are hoping that they might become de- extinct in 10 years. They  used to  live in  New Zealand.  I think they should de- extinct. It will be so cool!!!!!!! Moas are amazing. By Ryan

This week I learnt that the Moa had no wings! It was a flightless bird which was slow, all sizes, and hunted to extinction. The Haast Eagle hunted Moa. Humans also hunted Moa. They hunted Moa for both their eggs and their meat. Now days, people are trying to ‘de-extinct’ Moa (Bring Moa back to life). I think that it would be AWESOME!!! I would LOVE to see a Moa!!! It’s sort of disappointing that they were sadly, extremely flightless and very slow.  by Emily

This week I learnt that Moas only lived in New Zealand but they became extinct 500-600 years ago. You could find Moas in forests grasslands and mountains. They couldn’t fly because they didn’t have any wings. I want the Moas to come back from extinction because they are not harmless to humans because they don’t eat meat. But there’s one Moa that I don’t want to come back, which is the south island one because it’s giant. If one was chasing me I would be able to run away as fast as I could because Moas are not that fast, they are slow but really tall. So I wouldn’t mind if they came back to life.      By Ihaia

Read more

Manaiakalani Reading Practice Intensive Course – Day 7: Thinking

Introductions and Homework Feedback

Our homework was to use a couple of the vocabulary teaching strategies we had looked at on Day 6. I had used vocabulary.com to pre-teach vocabulary for our extended text. An example of this is the following vocabulary list and then the record of class activity (which I can’t post here as it identifies individual students and their progress). Unfortunately, many students were away through illness, so the completion rate was very low for this particular example.

As my Y10 Humanities – World Government course finished last term, I now have a new Y10 Humanities – Escape from Reality class and have only seen them twice so far, as I have been away ill this week. For this reason, I did not complete a second vocabulary activity, but hope to build some into my activities for the new class over the new few weeks.

 

Dorothy – Thinking: Manaiakalani Kaupapa & Shared Pedagogy

Dorothy talked about the history of 21st century transferrable skills from 4Cs to 5Cs to 7Cs as we have at Ōtaki College, and how Critical Thinking is always at the top of the list.

Critical literacy skills are essential for our learners to be able to make sense of the large amounts of information thrown at them, and to give them the skills to consider the reliability and authenticity of information.

Dorothy explained that CyberSmart has been a core part of Manaiakalani from the start and is a good source of materials for teachers to teach online skills. She showed an example of a lesson to help young people be aware of deep fake videos and other AI generated content.

Google have just announced that Gemini app and NotebookLM AI apps will now be available to all users, including those under 13. Schools should consider whether or not to leave these AI apps on, or turn them off for school domains.

 

Naomi – Higher Order Thinking to Access Deeper Meaning

Naomi introduced the focus for today, which is planned instruction to support higher order thinking to access the deeper meanings in text(s).

 

Kiri – Analysis as a Basis for Higher Order Thinking

Kiri recapped the levels of thinking model in the Bloom’ Taxonomy:

 

And also gave this link to a good introduction to the SOLO taxonomy.

 

Janet, Naomi  – Reading & Interpreting Academic Language of Text(s) 

Janet talked about the experience of lexical density – when students encounter complex, sophisticated texts, which contain a lot of unfamiliar vocabulary. We looked at strategies to help students with this type of text.

These texts go beyond ‘learning to read’ and into the realm of ‘reading to learn’.

One key facet of academic language is nominalisation – turning verbs and adjectives into nouns to make the language sound more sophisticated and using the passive rather than active voice. We looked at an activity which could be used to help students understand this nominalisation process, including an awesome video about Zombie Nouns.

To help students deal with nominalisation, they need to be aware of the suffixes used – these should cue them to the root meaning of the nominalised verb or adjective.

 

Critical Analysis to Read Critically

Naomi began by explaining that when introducing a text for critical analysis, we need to present a provocation – basically a thesis statement – with which students will have to agree or disagree, bringing critical analysis of the text to that provocation.  We need to resource the discussion, allowing students to bring prior knowledge, and a solid understanding of the text. We move beyond the Ground Rules for Talk into using prompts for specific roles, e.g. Critical Analyst. To start with, you can edit these down to two or three prompts and then gradually expand them.

We read some texts about climate change, based on the provocation: Climate Change is a Hoax. In our breakout group, we discussed the text and whether we agreed or disagreed with the provocation.

Kiri then looked at critical literacy, how text is not neutral, but always positions itself.

To help students understand this, we can help them identify things like stereotyping – gender, ethnicity, socio-economic status etc. Critical literacy could be a planned unit, or it might be the ‘teachable moment’ when we are reading a text.

Be on the alert for who or what is missing from the text – what groups or perspectives are not present at all? It is important to provide a range of texts presenting different perspectives: multiple and supplementary texts – of different genres – about the same issue, along with counter-texts which present an opposing viewpoint, and including a student choice text.

For my new Y10 Humanities course, Escape from Reality, I am looking at a critical literacy focus on the dangers of AI chatbots. My provocation is:

“An AI chatbot is the perfect therapist.”

I have found three texts so far that I will use with this provocation:

Obviously, this provocation and texts are touching on some very sensitive topics, so I will need to introduce them carefully and give students the opportunity to opt out if they think any of them may be triggering for them.  As I have only seen my new class twice so far, I will not be launching into this discussion until I know them a little better.

 

Janet – Strategy Builder: Synthesising

Janet reviewed the explicit teaching of reading strategies and gave a link to this key Ministry of Education resource.

To build critical thinking skills in our students, we need to move from inference to synthesis – a higher order learning skill. This is increasingly importance in a digital context. When our students do any Google search, they are now being presented with a ready-made synthesis of the information. They need to be able to critique this and, preferably, create their own synthesis.

Janet reminded us that the new curriculum includes specific achievement objectives for synthesis.

 

Naomi – Response-to-text Levels of Thinking

Naomi challenged us to create a response to text activity using the text we had selected for the critical thinking exercise. I used my Text 1 above: People Are Becoming Obsessed with ChatGPT and Spiraling Into Severe Delusions and have begun creating the following response to text activity (it is a work in progress – not yet finished):

 

Kiri – Pulling it all together

Kiri summarised the different aspects we have looked at today, and then we went into breakout groups to plan for a response to text activity we will use at some point in the next three weeks. For my activity in the slideshow above, I will be using a range of strategies, as below:

 

Reflection on Day 7: Thinking

I have enjoyed today’s focus on critical thinking as, to me as an English teacher, it is probably the most important skill I can pass on to my students to help them thrive in the future. I am fortunate in that our college has had previous Manaiakalani PD on Critical Literacy and on T-Shaped Literacy, so this material was familiar to me, and I was being reminded of strategies rather than coping with huge amounts of new information.

Having started on planning the response to text activity on my Text 1, I am now second-guessing myself and thinking that the text is at too high a level for many of my students. I may end up using it only with my top reading group as a result, rather than the whole class. I may choose an alternative text to use with my other reading groups.

Of course, I actually need to create reading groups for my new semester class! My Semester 2 class has 21 students, only 11 of whom were with me in the Semester 1 class, so I need to go back a few steps, look at the PAT data, and work out new groupings.

I am looking forward to the course, as the topic of the possibilities and risks of AI, virtual reality, and online gaming are very topical at present, and lend themselves really well to higher level thinking and discussion.

 

Homework: Thinking

Naomi reminded us to teach the critical analysis roles in our small groups before throwing our students in the deep end! Then maybe a simple reflection on how it went when they used the roles.

Read more

Powered by WordPress.com. Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑